JMD on Play The Game: A vote for Prince Ali is a likely vote for change – and for challenge
A vote for Prince Ali is a likely vote for change – and for challenge
Photo: FIFPro/Flickr 06.01.2015
FIFA vice president Prince Ali Bin Al Hussein’s announcement that he will challenge the world soccer body’s four-time president Sepp Blatter in elections later this year has definitively turned the poll into a battle for the group’s future. A vote for the prince is at least a vote against the FIFA president embattled as a result of multiple corruption scandals and more likely a vote for change.
With his announcement following months of canvassing of FIFA members to assess his chances of winning an uphill battle, Prince Ali has positioned himself as Mr. Blatter’s foremost challenger. And that is where the problems start. Former French diplomat and FIFA executive Jérôme Champagne like Prince Ali a reformer had already declared himself a candidate while ex-Chilean football association president Harold Maynes-Nicholls, another proponent of change, is believed to be considering putting himself forward as a candidate. A four candidate battle risks Mr. Blatter benefitting from the reformist vote being split among his three opponents.
During his four years as FIFA vice president and membership of the executive committee of the Asian Football Confederation (AFC), Prince Ali has however built a track record of achieving reform with his successful bid to change soccer rules to allow female Muslim players to wear a culturally acceptable headdress that meets safety and security standards; a resolution by the 13-member West Asian Football Federation that groups Middle Eastern soccer associations to put a woman’s right to play on par with that of a man; his ability to pick his battles and forge alliances; his emphasis on grassroots football through the Asian Football Development Project (AFDP); the introduction of corporate social responsibility into deliberations between business and soccer in the Middle East; and his stand against corruption and in favour of greater transparency and accountability.
In doing so, Prince Ali has made both friends and enemies. The difficulties he is likely to face in the upcoming electoral battle were evident at the AFC congress in Sao Paulo on the eve of the Brazil World Cup. The congress voted in favour of a proposal by AFC president Sheikh Salman bin Ebrahim Al Khalifa to automatically make the AFC president FIFA vice president. The decision effectively terminated Prince Ali’s position as elected vice president when his term ends later this year. The congress voted in favour of Sheikh Salman’s proposal even though it had earlier rejected the notion.
While Prince Ali was key in creating the basis for the banning for life from involvement in professional soccer of former FIFA executive committee member and AFC president Mohammed Bin Hammam, he failed in getting the Asian group to act on recommendations of an internal audit conducted by PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC) to possibly file criminal and civil charges against the disgraced official and renegotiate if not cancel the AFC’s $1 billion master rights agreement with Singapore-based World Sports Group. The burial of the audit by Mr. Bin Hammam’s successor, Sheikh Salman, serves as another indicator of resistance to change within Asian and world soccer governance.
Prince Ali is likely to be able to count on the support of a majority of members of UEFA whom he enlisted to help the AFC streamline some of its operations as well as reformist segments of Asia, including Japan, South Korea, Australia and Singapore. He is further well-positioned to garner support from the United States and a number of other associations in the Americas. The Middle East and North Africa are likely to split their vote between Mr. Blatter and Prince Ali, with a number of autocrats favouring the status quo. Prince Ali potentially will enjoy support from FIFA sponsors who worry that Mr. Blatter and FIFA’s sullied image could reflect badly on them. Emirates Airlines and Sony have already announced that they were ending their sponsorship agreements with FIFA.
At age 39, Prince Ali is the youngest serving official on FIFA’s executive committee. A half-brother of Jordanian King Hussein and a brigadier general in the Jordanian military with a long-standing passion for soccer for the sake of soccer, Prince Ali has been involved in the game since his 20s when he became president of the Jordanian Football Association, which he has turned into a model for associations elsewhere in the region. Fluent in Arabic, English and various Circassian languages, Prince Ali has also demonstrated sensitivity to minorities in a region that has become increasingly intolerant of the other.
Prince Ali’s announcement of his candidacy, a reflection of his personality and approach, suggests what his emphasis is likely to be should he win the election. He said he had decided to run because the time had come to “shift the focus away from administrative controversy and back to sport”, a reflection of his emphasis on soccer rather than on the power that comes with high office in FIFA. Prince Ali said his vision of FIFA was one of a “service organisation and a model of ethics, transparency and good governance.”
Like Mr. Champagne who welcomed electoral debate with Prince Ali, the Jordanian said his campaign would be “focused on ideas to strengthen and improve FIFA. The headlines should be about football, not about FIFA,” he said.
It is hard to take issue with Prince Ali’s vision and track record. He is however likely to discover that electoral victory does not automatically open the door to reform. No doubt, Prince Ali would bring a different tone and style to FIFA and a renewed emphasis on the game rather than exclusively on the business of the sport. But it will take all his communication and negotiation skills to counter vested interests in world soccer governance.
If there is one area, where Prince Ali may tread cautiously, that is the incestuous relationship between sports and politics that is nowhere more prevalent than in the Middle East and North Africa. Nonetheless, insistence on adherence to FIFA rules and regulations by national associations would go a long way in reducing political abuse of the sport. Inevitably, that insistence will have to be part of any effort to ensure transparency and accountability within FIFA.