top of page

IOC president’s call for transparency challenges Middle Eastern/Asian political dominance of soccer

Prince Nasser bin Hamad al-Khalifa: Commander of Bahrain's armed forces and National Olympic Committee. A divorce between sport and politics?

By James M. Dorsey

Taken at face value, a rare acknowledgment by International Olympic Committee president Thomas Bach that sports and politics are inextricably intertwined should be a first step towards radical reform that offers a proper structure to govern the relationship. That is nowhere truer than in Middle Eastern, North African and Asian soccer where political domination of the game is dominant despite insistence by the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) and world soccer governor FIFA that sports and politics are separate.

Speaking at the opening of the Asian Games in Incheon, South Korea, Mr. Bach said sports should acknowledge its ties to politics as well as big business but at the same time ensure that it maintains its neutrality.

"In the past, some have said that sport has nothing to do with politics, or they have said that sport has nothing to do with money or business. And this is just an attitude which is wrong and which we cannot afford anymore. We are living in the middle of society and that means that we have to partner up with the politicians who run this world," Mr. Bach said. He said politicians and business leaders needed to respect the autonomy of sporting bodies or risk diminishing their positive influence.

Mr. Bach targeted the AFC’s and FIFA’s denial of the marriage between sports and politics that most officials and analysts in the soccer world freely acknowledge by noting that allowing countries to set their own rules in football would mean that "international sport is over.”

The IOC president, who this month celebrates his first year in office, said that governing the relationship between sports, politics and business was a core theme of his presidency.

Mr. Bach’s vision for the Olympic Games is embedded in his agenda for the coming six years which involves making the bidding process more flexible, lowering the cost of hosting tournaments and creating a digital channel to promote Olympic sports and values such as fair play.

Ensuring that the incestuous relationship between sports and politics in Middle Eastern, North African and Asian soccer is transparent and independent will take a lot more than focusing on the organization of tournaments and the projection of values. Little short of restructuring the relationship and developing a governance regime that shields soccer from political interference will break the grip of autocratic regimes on the sport. Middle Eastern and North African autocrats use soccer for a host of self-serving political purposes, including pacifying populations; ensuring that soccer pitches do not emerge as venues of protest; and seeking to improve their tarnished images at home and abroad.

A review of Middle Eastern and North African members of the boards of regional associations like the AFC and the Confederation of African Football (CAF) as well as of officials populating the boards of major soccer clubs and the ownership structures of those clubs in countries like Egypt, the Gulf states, Syria, Lebanon and Iran shows that they are populated by members of autocratic ruling families or executives closely aligned with government. The same is true for Mr. Bach’s own backyard, the national Olympic committees in the Middle East and North Africa. The intimate relationship between sports and politics is symbolized by the powerful role that the president of the Association of National Olympic Committees (ANOC) and Olympic Council of Asia, Sheikh Ahmed Al Fahad Al Sabah, a prominent member of Kuwait’s ruling family, plays in world sports.

The election last year of Bahraini Sheikh Salman bin Ebrahim Al Khalifa to complete the term of disgraced AFC president Mohammed Bin Hammam, the Qatari national at the centre of the Qatar controversy and the FIFA scandals, also says much about the intimate relationship between politics and soccer governance in the Middle East and Asia. Three national soccer players in Sheikh Salman’s home country were three years ago denounced as traitors, detained and tortured for participating in anti-government demonstrations three years ago. The players have been released but Bahrain has since arrested two whole teams.

Sheikh Salman, a member of Bahrain’s repressive ruling family and head of the Bahrain Football Association, has refused to comment on the plight of his players insisting that sports and politics are separate. British prosecutors have been considering a petition by a Bahraini national for the arrest of a relative of Sheikh Salman’s, Prince Nasser bin Hamad al-Khalifa, the eldest son of King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, commander of the Gulf island’s Royal Guard and head of the Bahrain Olympic Committee, on suspicion of involvement in the abuse of political prisoners. Prince Nasser phoned into the show on state-run television that denounced the three national team players in a demonstration of support of what amounted to a kangaroo court.

Sheikh Salman persuaded the AFC Congress in June in Brazil to tighten his political control of Asian and Middle Eastern soccer governance by agreeing to combine the post of AFC president and FIFA vice president rather than maintain the vice presidency as an elected position. The move was also designed to sideline the current FIFA vice president, Jordanian Prince Al bin Al Hussein, the one member of a ruling family, who has emerged as the foremost reformer in soccer governance, campaigning for greater transparency, accountability, focus on grassroots and women’s rights.

In response, Prince Ali has said he would run for election to the FIFA executive committee when his current term as vice president ends in 2015. “I don’t care about playing musical chairs. If you are an ExCo member, you are an ExCo member; it doesn’t matter where you sit. The composition of Asia has changed and if we want to have all the power in Asia under one person, time will tell if that is a good decision or not... I did notice that coming to Brazil there were many influential players in Asia and outside of Asia and outside of football as well that were pushing for this for whatever reason. If that’s what they want, go ahead. Time will tell if that’s a good decision or not… I don’t give a damn about protocol. I care about football. It doesn’t make a difference, titles or what have you. For me, I’ve done what I had to do to protect the interests of Asian football," Prince Ali told reporters earlier this month.

James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies as Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, co-director of the Institute of Fan Culture of the University of Würzburg and the author of the blog, The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer, and a forthcoming book with the same title.

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page