top of page

Netanyahu and ultraconservatives jeopardise Israeli security

James M. Dorsey



I hope you enjoyed today’s column and podcast. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber. Paid subscribers help me cover the cost of contributing fact-based analysis and understanding to a debate that has become increasingly polarised and weaponised. To become a paid subscriber, please click on the subscription button at http://www.jamesmdorsey.substack.com and choose one of the subscription options. Thank you.

To listen to an audio podcast click here.


Please Subscribe

 

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has fractured a long-standing pillar of Israeli foreign policy that dictated it always needed to ensure the backing of the United States. Fixing the pillar may prove easier said than done.


US President Joe Biden’s insistence that US support for Israel is “ironclad,” despite the conditioning of arms sales, is rooted as much in the president’s deep-seated commitment to Israel as it is a reminder of the risk to Israel of surrendering a principle that enabled Israel to do what it wanted.


To be sure, past US presidents, including Ronald Reagan, have put the US-Israeli relationship on the line to pressure Israeli leaders.


Israeli Prime Minister Menahem Begin and US President Ronald Reagan. Credit: Israel Government Press Office


Mr. Netanyahu’s defiance of US insistence that it refrains from launching a full-blown offensive in Gaza, saying that 76 years ago when Israel declared independence, “We were alone. We had no weapons, there was an arms embargo on Israel… Today, we are much stronger… If we have to stand alone, we will stand alone,” echoes his predecessor, Menahem Begin, Israel’s first right-wing prime minister.


Responding in 1982 to the Reagan administration and then US Senator Joe Biden’s criticism of Israel’s invasion of Lebanon and Israeli settlement policy, Mr. Begin thundered, “Don’t threaten us with cutting off your aid. I am not a Jew with trembling knees. I am a proud Jew with 3,700 years of proud history… We will stand by our principles. We will defend them. And when necessary, we will die for them, with or without your aid.”


Mr. Netanyahu’s problem is that America in the 2020s is not America of the 1980s.

While not irreversible, Mr. Biden’s pausing of the delivery to Israel of heavy payload 2000 and 500-pound bombs, and the threat of further conditioning of arms sales, suggests that the days are gone in which Mr. Netanyahu could boast about US support for the Jewish state.


Binyamin Netanyahu boasts in the 1980s about Israeli influence in the United States. Source: Twitter


Speaking on Israeli television in the 1980s when he first served as deputy chief of mission at the Israeli embassy in Washington and then as ambassador to the United Nations, Mr. Netanyahu bragged, “We have the Senate, the Congress, and a record-strong Jewish lobby. We have a strong influence over the general support in America. America won’t force us into anything.”


Contrast that with Mr. Biden’s change of US policy in recent days, demands by Congressional Democratic Party members demanding a halt to US arms sales, nationwide pro-Palestinian protests at US university campuses, and opinion polls showing that more than half of Americans disapprove of Israel’s war conduct.


Moreover, Israel, long a master in dominating the narrative and catering to Western media’s needs, has lost the plot.


Not only has Israel severely restricted media access and gone as far as banning Al Jazeera from reporting from Israel, but it no longer seems able or willing to provide credible information and arguments.


To be sure, defending the policies of the most far-right, ultranationalist, and ultraconservative government in Israel’s history would be challenging under any circumstance.


Even so, Israeli government spokesman Avi Hyman demonstrated Israel’s loss of the plot in a lengthy interview on Piers Morgan Uncensored, the prominent British journalist’s popular YouTube talk show.


Piers Morgan interviews Avi Hyman. Source: YouTube


Interviewed against the backdrop of numerous allegations of violations of international law in Gaza and on the day of the reported discovery of yet another mass grave at a hospital in the Strip that Israeli forces attacked, Mr. Hyman was flustered and speechless when asked by Mr. Morgan how many Palestinian civilians had been killed in the seven-month-old war.


“We don’t have exact figures. As you know, it’s the fog of war,” Mr. Hyman answered, unable to explain why Israel had precise numbers of fighters it says it killed but not for the civilian casualty toll.


Mr. Hyman remained silent for painful seconds when Mr. Morgan challenged him by saying, “You literally have no idea how many civilians you killed… That’s complete nonsense. Why are you authorized to give me the number of terrorists you killed but not a number of civilians? I don’t understand… You want me to believe that you are incredibly careful about how many civilians you are killing, and you have an ‘amazing exemplary record,’ but you don’t how many civilians you are killing. So, how do I know you’ve been careful?”


Israel has consistently rejected the Gaza health ministry’s figure of more than 34,000 deaths and more than 75,000 wounded in the seven-month-old war without providing alternative numbers. Still, asserts it killed 14,000 Palestinian fighters.


Analysts suggest that Mr. Netanyahu’s abandoning of a pillar of Israeli foreign policy amounts to submitting to blackmail by his ultra-nationalist and ultra-conservative coalition partners, who have threatened to collapse the government if the prime minister fails to launch an offensive in Rafah.


While that may be true, Mr. Netanyahu’s affinity with Israel’s far-right and religious ultra-conservative may not be just an opportunistic move to save his political skin. His empathy for the religious ultraconservatives, despite being secular in outlook, dates back to the days when he felt confident about the US-Israeli relationship.


Binyamin Netanyahu visits Rabbi Menachem M. Schneerson. Credit: Chabadinfo


At the time, Mr. Netanyahu forged a relationship with the Brooklyn-based Lubavitch Hassidic Rabbi Menachem M. Schneerson, leader of one of the most influential movements in religious Jewry. Mr. Netanyahu described Mr. Schneerson, who died in 1994, as “the most influential Jew of our time.”


Mr. Schneerson fiercely opposed an Israeli withdrawal from territories it conquered in the 1967 Middle East war. He called the principle of withdrawal in exchange for peace with the Palestinians and Arab states, fixture of Israeli policy abandoned by Mr. Netanyahu an "illusion of peace.”


Addressing the United Nations General Assembly years after Mr. Schneerson’s death, Mr. Netanyahu quoted the rabbi as telling him, "You will be serving in a house of darkness, but remember that even in the darkest place, the light of a single candle can be seen far and wide.”


That advice may be guiding Mr. Netanyahu as much as his willingness to sacrifice Israel’s national security interests and the lives of Hamas-held hostages to pro-long his embattled political life.


Israeli soldiers in Gaza chant. Credit: Middle East Eye


Mr. Netanyahu’s invocation early in the war, echoed by Israeli politicians and military personnel fighting in Gaza, of the Biblical command to “attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys” fits the mould of Mr. Schneerson’s thinking.


Although challenged by numerous rabbinical scholars over the centuries, Mr. Schneerson led ultra-conservative rabbis in the 1980s in popularizing and applying to Palestinians the concept of Amalek, the grandson of Esau and his descendants and anyone else who lived in their Canaanite territory.


The ultraconservatives view Amalek as the archetype of evil symbolic of Israel, and the Jews’ nemeses.


While Mr. Netanyahu may be a cat with nine lives who will grab any opportunity that serves his personal interests, Mr. Schneerson and his fellow ultra-conservatives offer the prime minister religious legitimization of policies that have deprived Israel of its moral standing and put at risk a key pillar of Israel’s ability to defend itself.



Dr. James M. Dorsey is an award-winning journalist and scholar, a Senior Fellow at the National University of Singapore’s Middle East Institute and Adjunct Senior Fellow at Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, and the author of the syndicated column and blog, The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer.


The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Please Subscribe




4 commentaires


jane Lily
jane Lily
7 days ago

Because of its wealth of insightful material and relevant themes, this work is sure to pique the interest of readers from many backgrounds.

gacha life

J'aime

The ultraconservatives view Amalek as the archetype of evil symbolic of Israel. Dual Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay Service

J'aime

The convergence of political strategy and religious ideology, exemplified by Mr. Netanyahu's citation of biblical mandates throughout the conflict, gives rise to substantial ethical considerations. The situation's complexity is underscored by the impact that ultraconservative religious leaders, such as Mr. Schneerson, have had on molding Israel's approach to the conflict. flappy bird

J'aime

The intertwining of religious ideology and political strategy, as seen in Mr. Netanyahu's invocation of Biblical commands during the conflict, raises significant ethical concerns. The influence of ultra-conservative religious leaders like Mr. Schneerson in shaping Israel's approach to the conflict underscores the complexity of the situation.

tunnel rush

J'aime
bottom of page